It is Zeus' anathema on our epoch for the dynamism of
our economies and the heresy of our economic methods and
policies that we should agonize between the Scylla of
numismatic plethora and the Charybdis of economic anaemia.
It is not in my idiosyncrasy to be ironic and sarcastic
but my diagnosis would be that politicians are rather
crypto-plethorists. Although they emphatically stigmatize
numismatic plethora, they energize it through their tactics
and practices.
Our policies should be based more on economic and less
on political criteria. Our gnomon has to be metron between
economic, strategic and philanthropic scopes. Political
magic has always been anti-economic.
In an epoch characterized by monopolies, oligopolies,
monopsonies, monopolistic antagonism and polymorphous
inelasticities, our policies have to be more orthological.
But this should not be metamorphosed into plethorophobia
which is endemic among academic economists.
Numismatic symmetry should not hyper-antagonize economic
acme.
A greater antagonization between the practices of the
economic and numismatic archons is basic.
Parallel to this, we have to synchronize and harmonize
more and more our economic and numismatic policies panethnically.
These scopes are more practicable now, when the prognostics
of the political and economical barometer are halcyonic.
The history of our didymous Organizations in this sphere
has been didactic and their gnostic practices will always
be a tonic to the polyonymous and idiomorphous ethnical
economies. The genesis of the programmed organization
will dynamize these polities. Therefore, I sympathize,
although not without criticism on one or two themes, with
the apostles and the hierarchy of our organizations in
their zeal to program orthodox economic and numismatic
polities.
I apologise for having tyrannised you with my Hellenic
phraseology.
In my epilogue, I emphasise my eulogy to the philoxenous
autochthons of this cosmopolitan metropolis and my encomium
to you, Kyrie, and the stenographers.
